|
LARC Environmental Enrichment
Mission
The Environmental Enrichment Program was originally designed to
address the promotion of “psychological well-being of non-human
primates,” outlined by the 1985 Amendment to the Animal Welfare
Act (AWA). Since its installation, the program has expanded to
envelope all species in biomedical research. It is our aim to improve
the well-being of all laboratory research animals at UCSF and provide
people working with animals the knowledge and skills to do so as
well. By improving animals’ psychological well-being, we
will also likely improve the reliability of research outcomes.
What is it and
why do we need it?
Environmental enrichment is defined as “ a process for improving
or enhancing animal environments and care within the context of
the inhabitants biology and natural history. It is a dynamic process
in which changes to structures and husbandry practices are made
with the goal of increasing behavioral choices available to animals
and drawing out their species-appropriate behaviors and abilities,
thus enhancing animal welfare” (Shape of Enrichment / Kay
Stewart).
The need for animal welfare improvement is a reflection of the
ethical concerns in our society. High ethical standards of animal
welfare are important as they support humane treatment of animals,
including the promotion of psychological well-being. Our enrichment
program’s main function is to be certain we meet and often
surpass such standards.
For several species, the program is important because it is federally
mandated. Environmental enrichment plans for facilities housing
nonhuman primates and canines are required by the Animal Welfare
Act (USDA). “…research facilities must develop, document,
and follow a plan for environmental enhancement adequate to promote
psychological well-being of nonhuman primates…” (Section
3.81). At any site inspections, copies of the program can be requested
for review.
Our program’s goal to improve animal welfare promotes more
reliable research outcomes. Positive human-animal relationships,
proper social housing conditions, and boredom avoidance often relieves
distress. Our enrichment program targets these specific areas to
help provide investigators with an animal model that can be more
justifiably applicable to human patients.
Services
We provide various services in our program. Please contact us
to find out more about the different types of enrichment we can
provide to your specific species as well as the behavioral management
services we offer, including positive reinforcement training. Enrichment
is already included in the per diem rate that investigators pay
for animal care; therefore, our services bare no additional costs
to the investigator. So it only makes sense to utilize our services!
Resources
Peer-Reviewed Journals
Books and
Notebooks
Kleiman, D, M.E. Allen and K. V. Thompson. 1997. Wild
Animals in Captivity: Principles and Techniques. Chicago:
University of Chicago Press.
Markowitz, H. and G. Woodworth. 1978. Behavior of Captive Wild
Animals. Chicago: Nelson Hall.
Novak, M.A. (ed), and A. Petto. 1991. Through the Looking
Glass: Issues of Psychological Well-Being in Captive Non-Human
Primates. Washington D.C.: American Psychological Association
Segal, E.F.(ed). 1989. Housing, Care and Psychological
Well-Being of Captive and Lab Primates. Park Ridge,
New Jersey: Noyes Publications.
Shepherdson, D. , J.D. Mellen, M. Hutchins. 1998. Second
Nature: Environmental Enrichment for Captive Animals.
Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press.
U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Public Health Service, and
Primate Information Center. 1992. Environmental Enrichment
Information Resources for Nonhuman Primates: 1987 - 1992.
Beltsville, Maryland: National Agricultureal Library, Animal Welfare
Information Center.
|